How we work
Editorial Review Policy
Last updated: June 2025
Purpose of this policy
This document explains how BritJackpotVault forms editorial scores and review content for UK casino operators. We want the process to be transparent so that visitors can understand what our comparisons represent, what they do not represent, and how to interpret them.
The seven review criteria
Every operator is assessed using the same seven criteria, applied in the same way. This consistency is important — it means scores represent comparable assessments rather than different standards applied to different brands.
Offer clarity
We assess whether welcome and ongoing promotions are presented in plain language, whether wagering requirements and game restrictions are visible before opt-in, and whether the key conditions are accessible without deep navigation.
Site usability
We look at how the site is organised, how well navigation works between major sections, how quickly games load, and whether the interface is consistent across different areas of the product.
Payment options
We note which deposit and withdrawal methods are accepted, whether processing times are disclosed, and whether minimum and maximum transaction limits are visible.
Game variety
We assess the breadth of the game library across slots, live casino, table games, and other categories, and note which software providers supply titles to the platform.
Mobile experience
We test the site on mobile browsers on both Android and iOS. We note whether an app is available and whether the mobile experience replicates the core functionality of the desktop site.
Terms transparency
We assess whether the main terms and conditions are accessible, readable, and written in plain English, and whether operator terms are flagged clearly at the point of promotions.
Responsible gambling visibility
We check whether deposit limits, session limits, loss limits, self-exclusion, and cooling-off tools are accessible from account settings, and whether GAMSTOP and BeGambleAware are linked or signposted visibly.
How scores are formed
Each operator receives an editorial score out of 10.0. The score reflects our collective assessment across the seven criteria listed above. It is a summary estimate, not an algorithmic output or a weighted formula.
Scores are informed by publicly available information: what is visible on the operator's own website, the accessibility and readability of their terms, and the presence and functionality of responsible gambling tools. We do not have access to backend systems, proprietary complaint data, or real-time payout records.
Scores are not official ratings, regulatory assessments, or guarantees of quality. They should be read as a directional comparison — useful for understanding relative strengths and weaknesses — not as a definitive judgment on any operator.
Not every operator receives the same score. We deliberately vary scores to reflect genuine differences in what we find. An operator that makes terms easy to find and responsible gambling tools clearly accessible will generally score better on those criteria than one that does not.
Review updates and accuracy
We review operator listings periodically. However, casino products change frequently — offers, terms, payment methods, and responsible gambling tools can be updated by operators without notice.
You should always verify current terms, offers, and features directly at the operator's own website before registering or depositing. Our content is a starting point for comparison, not a substitute for direct verification.
If you believe any information on this site is inaccurate or out of date, please use the contact form to let us know and we will review it.
Independence from commercial relationships
Affiliate relationships do not influence editorial scores or review content. Operators are not able to purchase higher scores, better placement, or more favourable descriptions. Full details of how our affiliate funding works are available in the Affiliate Disclosure.
